Taking someone’s life is often a heinous crime that devastates people, communities, and society as a whole. The harsh punishment serves being a deterrent to prospective offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a effectively-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
limitation of liability for the extent of the cap provided from the registered mortgage deed(Banking Regulation)
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for that Supreme Court with the United States is out there about the court’s website.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
In this site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, exploring its provisions and the gravity of its punishment.
only within the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only on the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge since it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders maintaining in view that on the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out because of the counsel to the respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more
Online access towards the case management system for the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases might be searched using name or case number.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station due to likely health risks and hazards.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses like self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which could bring about reduced charges or acquittal.
this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion with the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition for the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Advancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in more info their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter for a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) in the Pakistan Constitution delivers authentic jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to choose up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
It's also important to note that granting of seniority to your civil servant without the actual duration of service nearly violates all the service composition as a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming these benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention of the regulation nor from the equity. Read more